Die schrullige "Bones" kann aus den Knochen der Toten ganz erstaunliche Rückschlüsse auf Mord und Täter ziehen. Trotzdem hat FBI-Agent Seeley Booth . Bones - Die Knochenjägerin - Staffel 10 - DVD mit Emily Deschanel, David Boreanaz, Michaela Conlin online bestellen auf jimkollevik.se Versandkostenfreie. Bones - Die Knochenjägerin jederzeit online sehen! Das Video on Demand- Portal TV NOW ermöglicht rund um die Uhr Zugriff auf Bones - Die Knochenjägerin.
online bones -But Brennan and her team discover this was not suicide, it was murder, and the victim was a soldier who had served in Iraq, not a war protester as originally thought. Die forensische Anthropologin Dr. The circumstances and her loss of memory are enough to rattle even Brennan, who's in New Orleans on vacation, helping to identify victims of Hurricane Katrina. House - Staffel 1 [dt. Eureka - Staffel 1. Brennan's former forensic anthropology professor - and ex-lover - Dr. The Man on the Fairway. Bitte melden Sie sich an, um Produkte in Ihre Merkliste hinzuzufügen. Wo ich bin, ist Chaos - Aber ich
I don't even care if the teenager in question was murdered or committed suicide, and I won't be watching the show ever again. The sets and production design is superb, the ensemble cast is excellent the leads are very good and shine when the material is worthy of their chara The sets and production design is superb, the ensemble cast is excellent the leads are very good and shine when the material is worthy of their characters.
They set up "Bones" as a brilliant and enlightened woman and not just in terms of forensic science but in terms of her broader cultural though not pop-culture knowledge and sensitivity.
The kind of crap that only people brainwashed by the mainstream corporate US media are stupid enough to think and believe. At the same time the show makes it very clear that she knows nothing of the kind of pop culture references that you get from watching precisely the kind of TV media her character does not have anything to do with.
I started watching at a good part three discs into the DVD set so my first impression was positive as I saw the Christmas and California episodes and they were very good, no problem.
Then I got to start fresh from the pilot. Things set up very well. The awful episodes tend to do that cruel reactionary American thing of ridiculing the underdog instead of championing or having empathy.
The worst episode concerned an Afghan man who is blown up in his car. An ignorance that presumes Afghans to be Arabs as if people speak Arabic in that country.
They are not Arabs and they speak Farsi Dari and Pashto. The lead character would know the difference between the phrases "Afghani" and "Afghan".
But not the ignorant writers and producers apparently, who seem to have a level of education of other cultures in the ball park, of the has no clue George Bush jnr.
While we have destroyed the nation of Iraq in the name of a war-on-terror that Iraq had nothing to do with. Until of course we invaded, ruined what was left after a decade of our genocidal sanctions and turned the country into a terrorist university, where before there were none.
The character of "Bones" is written as being a woman of certain level of education and cultural awareness. She would have neither any truck or affinity with either the Clinton or Bush camp as she would be aware of their shared river of blood and brutal harm upon the world including Muslim nations.
She would not spout crap that implies an innocent USA was attacked by nutcases. Stupidly unrealistic - nearly fairy tale level fantasy! Okay, it's good to see Boreanaz again - I loved Angel.
If you're trying to create a modern-day crime drama you need to establish a If you're trying to create a modern-day crime drama you need to establish a sense of adult realism combined with a realistic development of human relationships.
Be clever and research your subject. Keep experts on the set who might correct you if you step over the line.
This drama has NONE of that! A science-fiction hologram machine creating details that are impossible to deduce.
Impossible to reach conclusions such as the precise type of knife used in a murder or the weight of a hammer used to kill someone.
Add to this mix; comic-book, 2-Dimensional, cardboard relationships with contrived antagonisms apparently shared by everyone for everyone.
Boreanaz's behaviors are more reminiscent of a 40's Dick Tracy than a modern day criminalist and displays a contempt for scientists that is just absurd.
Either that or continue to assume that its audience is a group of drooling morons who really believe all this crap is possible.
It's EASY to fake it and hope your audience is too stupid to catch it. It's HARD to actually do the work and research your subject.
I'm sure some people will see my views as precious or over-purist about the book, but frankly I don't see why they bothered to make this TV version o I'm sure some people will see my views as precious or over-purist about the book, but frankly I don't see why they bothered to make this TV version of the Kathy Reichs character Temperance Brennan.
They would have been better off just doing a brand new character who is a forensic anthropologist because the kind of people who will like this utterly anodyne show that looks like every other damn show on television will not care two hoots for anything in the Kathy Reichs novels, and Reichs' fans will be insulted that this underwear catalogue version of the stories has been thrown onto the screen that bears little or no relation to the original.
Firstly, the Temperance Brennan character is played by a woman barely old enough to have qualified in her field, let alone have gained any kind of meaningful experience.
Because, Jesus, how could a woman over 35 ever be of any use or interest to an entertaining television show? Better make her young and fluffy looking!
Leaving aside that some of the best female characters of the past few years have included Frances Conroy in Six Feet Under and Glenn Close in The Shield, and it's also not exactly impossible to find a woman who is attractive and interesting but just so happens not to be in her teens.
In fact this show has the opposite effect, depriving the character of any texture and credibility, so obvious is its lazy and insincere nod to the "Gee, I'm like, such a strong and serious woman, okay?
It's really insulting to women, and in fact anyone who likes to see strong and interesting women on TV or otherwise. Why can't a woman get her hands dirty, do her job well, be over 30 but still be attractive and worth watching?
Emmy Nominated actress Mariska Hartigay is very attractive, plays a credible crime investigator in Special Victims Unit, and is 41 years old.
Emmy- and Golden Globe-winning and Oscar nominated Alfre Woodard is attractive, interesting, carries authority and dominates every scene she's ever acted in.
If I close my eyes I can't even remember what the actress they chose for this travesty looks like. I had to look up her name.
What's the point of hiring an actress for such shallow reasons if she's not going to make any impact whatsoever? She may be talented and charismatic just not on this evidence , but she's only in this to look pretty and that's boring.
Lots of women look pretty, and happen to be useful to society for other things as well. Middle aged old fart TV executives don't realise this, or that half their audience are women and the other half quite like women too.
Secondly, they have jettisoned everything that is interesting about the story. No chance of showing a couple of places featured less often in television shows, Like Montreal and Carolina from the source novels, then?
Brennan was a recovering alcoholic with a teenage daughter in the original, she occasionally clashed with the culture, language, people and differing police procedure in Canada.
She got involved in really intriguing cases. We suspended a certain amount of disbelief that a real life Forensic Anthropologist would get in danger and be central to an investigation for the glimpse we got into a fascinating and less often seen area of crime investigation.
Now not only is she just out of med school and gym socks, not doing any of the original stuff in the books AND solving crimes neatly every 54 minutes including commercial breaks.
Now she's writing novels about them as well! Kathy Reichs has time to write the novels because while her work is fascinating, she isn't actually the Tempe Brennan character.
This is just lame. This show is garbage because it tries to use the name of Kathy Reichs to add credibility to what is in fact just another mediocre show, not worthy of her books or something like CSI which is utterly populist but ten times more interesting and original than this , like a lazy schoolkid trying to skate through his homework by using a couple of fancy quotations to spruce up a half-written essay.
It's also garbage because it could have used the source material to make something quite different and interesting but chose CHOSE!
Or it could have just made a light, entertaining show without any pretension. They wanted to use the popular interest in forensics, and they wanted to cash in on CSI, and they wanted to re-create some Mulder and Scully chemistry.
They failed to measure up to any of the elements they imitate, because the originals were exactly that. As it is this doesn't even stand up to Quincy.
I'm surprised Kathy Reichs put her name to it. The first season of Bones is playing in Finland and I can't believe the amount of bullshit that this show puts on - the characters are shallow, poorl The first season of Bones is playing in Finland and I can't believe the amount of bullshit that this show puts on - the characters are shallow, poorly directed and clumsy.
It's a poor mans' CSI. Or actually, CSI without coherent plot. Although Bones has potential, it fails due to the lacking of the director who hasn't been able to extract the essence of the show from the actors.
It's actually sad to see a show throw it all away when it could had been a descent show with just a pinch more thought.
From the start you get the feeling how awkward the acting is. Long story short - don't waste your time on Bones.
I just finished watching one episode S1- 5 A boy in a bush , so maybe my review is not very fair. But based on that episode, this is a very poor versi But based on that episode, this is a very poor version of CSI, the acting is crap.
The main character, Dr whatever her name is, is so fake it actually hurts. I wouldn't cast her to do an add for dog food!
The other hurtful thing is David Boreanaz of the "Angel" fame, a good actor, does a great job, but wasted coz of the idiotic acting of that woman.
Supporting cast is OK, but all is ruined due to this stupid acting of Emily Deschanel. Very disappointing version of CSI, very sorry to see it appear on the filmography of some of the potential talents involved in it.
That woman is really sh t, at least in that episode. But based on this one view, I will not even invest watching it even if it was shown on an elevator screen.
I found the first 15 minutes or so to be a little "trite". The characters didn't seem to fit comfortably in their skin.
But by the end of the pilot I But by the end of the pilot I was very much interested, especially in the forensics aspect.
I have a friend who is an anthropologist and I'm going to get her opinion about the Dr. The series has a lot of potential and I especially like that unlike X Files, these characters are dealing with "real life" events rather than other worldly events.
I think the lead actors are good together and am looking forward to the building of their chemistry together.
Whether as working partners or romantics, I don't care, I just want there to be a degree of tension between them that will keep things interesting.
This is so bad I don't know where to begin. The lead role is a good starting point. It is a supreme Mary Sue character that has few things in common w It is a supreme Mary Sue character that has few things in common with the original one from the book, who was a bit more credible.
No, this one is invincible, infallible, indomitable, and insipid even beyond the overinflated standards that this "chicks with swords" era that our medias are spinning out of late.
She is a twenty-something top-model, thin as a match yet rich, already a leader in her academic field, a kung-fu master, a natural sniper and seems to have enough authority to naturally trump anyone official like puny FBI agents.
To balance it out, she is supposed to be socially awkward due to her typically harsh upbringing that transformed her into a "Spock" which gives us some delighted moments where she wonders what is "Star Wars", or "American Idol", but yet when it's really important she can conveniently reveal herself as a top negotiator and diplomat, because she is so superior, ya know.
To top it out, she is played by a wooden actress. The more talented Boreanaz serves as a faire-valoir token for this construct, acting as a bumbling comic-relief and house "Watson".
In fact, everything in there is a pop-parody of better works like Sherlock Holmes, CSI and X-Files, from which it tries to emulate the sexual tension between main protagonists.
It is however cheaper, as this is delivered with all the subtlety of an elbow poke in the ribs, but a million million poor factory girls will doubtlessly buy into it, hence the crazy rating this turkey gets.
In fact, the lowest common denominator goes a long way in this sad puppy, resulting in titillating sex details from the legion of sidekicks that aim to pass it out as daring and trendy, while the overall tone of the show carries an obvious neo-conservative view on things.
Story-wise, there's not much here to feast upon, as crimes that always start out with some gruesome remains are resolved using non-existent technology while the "squints", lovable but so wrong the women less than the guys goes on varied theories, all of them futile as the main character has it all from the start, and once it is established she goes out and then punch the guy, typically a real tough hombre, with a spin kick here and a slapper there.
I watched the show and it did feel familiar, yet fresh also. They seem like real squints, and that is a whole other world they live in.
A bit of a stretch on the Holographic skull and body stuff. I'll go with you there, but only if you let the squint out of the lab more.
David B is and always will be Angel to some people, watch this show and you'll come away thinking its more Angelus than Angel, the humor and comic timing between him and Emily has the makings of a Moonlighting relationship if, IF the writers want to play it out that way.
All in all, a good show, directing was crisp the photography was also good. I am a massive fan of David Boreanaz so obviously i started watching this show for him alone, but to my delight this is turning out to be one of the I am a massive fan of David Boreanaz so obviously i started watching this show for him alone, but to my delight this is turning out to be one of the most well-rounded show there has been on television in years.
Despite what people might have thought of David Boreanaz's acting abilities, by starring in Bones he has proved that he is a well rounded actor whom can take any role and make it his own.
The rest of the cast has been perfectly selected to bounce of David and make the show the best there can be.
Also i am impressed with how Emily has turned out as an actor, in the first few episodes i thought she was a bit of a hollow actress, kind of carboardy, but i have since been proved very wrong and feel bad for terrible of how quick i judged her.
I can only hope than this show continues to be made for a least another couple of years so we fans can find out as much as there is to know about our beloved characters.
S To Fox Please please do not be as cruel as the bigwigs at the WB and cancel this show at the prime of it's run as it would be a dying shame and also doing this would grossly reduce your viewers.
The addition of David Boreanaz also was a big dra The addition of David Boreanaz also was a big draw, as he is a very charismatic actor and I adored Angel!
For fans of Ms Reichs books, this is a slightly odd amalgam of Kathy herself and her main character Temperance Brennan, who on the show is also a crime author like Ms Reichs - a top forensic anthropologist and author.
The characters are all new, apart from Brennan's ex-husband Pete although we only got a glimpse of him in the season premiere plus it is set in Washington DC rather than Canada and Virginia as in the books.
Tempe herself is rather different than the book character. Emily Deschanel is fine, but rather young and headstrong compared to the book Tempe.
Even in the one episode, we have seen her rushing into things quite recklessly. I guess they wanted to make her a little more dynamic for TV. The chemistry between Brennan and Booth Boreanaz was pretty good from the start, although they need to handle it properly.
Maybe the Mulder and Scully reference is a hint of how they might handle things. However, the crime was a little flimsy. This first episode seemed to focus far more on establishing character and tone than on plot.
Probably something that will change with future episodes. On the whole, Riechs fans can have fun being snooty and complaining about Tempe's drinking and the lack of her cat, but I thought the show had definite possibilities.
I know I'm keen to see how things unfold. I didn't expect to like it as much as I liked it. In fact, it's a sure sign of cancellation how much I like this show.
I never like crime shows. My mom loves them, but I find them dull, because they're about plots not characters. This is a crime show about characters not as good as "The Closer" -- the crime show I adored this summer -- mind you , and I enjoyed it.
At times, it seemed far-fetched, and the whole Senator plot-point in the pilot seemed awful easy, but the dialogue worked, the characters intrigue me, and the chemistry is great.
I expect good things from it. So good that you are going to feel it in the bones. I love this show. I have to say, the pilot is not that good but keep on watching the episodes and I can assure you, you are gonna love it.
The character are really amazing and you can see them dealing with real life and their own "world of bones" at the same time.
Zach is one of those character I don't really have much to say. Angie is really nice and at the same time I can't stand how she always seems to connect with the cases they are working on.
Hodgins has his own view of life and really wants to stay away from his family, so he spends most of the time at work Booth and Bones have an amazing chemistry together and exact opposites, but at the same time they are the same.
Both of them, you can say, uses their work as a way to "fix" their personals issues. You have to see it. The Scare in the Score. Booth delves into his past when dead bodies start turning up around Washington, D.
Brennan worries about her father, but wonders if she can trust him after he doesn't tell her about a medical procedure. The Grief and the Girl.
Grief over a recent loss creates a rift between Booth and Brennan, who is also surprised by a visit from an ex-boyfriend. The Steal in the Wheels.
A hay-baler accident that claims a young man's life sends Booth, Brennan and Aubrey undercover in the cutthroat world of demolition derbies.
Gordon Wyatt shows up to help Hodgins and Cam chart a new course in the Gormogon investigation. The Radioactive Panthers in the Party.
The battered and burning body of an up-and-coming filmmaker lands on a moving car, opening an investigation of unusual locations and characters linked to his movie.
The Day in the Life. News that Kovac has escaped sends Booth scurrying to protect himself and those closest to him from the killer's most dangerous plan to date.
The End in the End. In the Series finale, Kovac is still on the loose as the team looks for evidence to track him down, but they'll have to do it without Brennan after she experiences a setback.
You May Also Like. Select Your Plan No hidden fees, equipment rentals, or installation appointments. A few shows play with commercials before and after the video.
Stream on your favorite devices Unlimited access to streaming content Switch plans or cancel anytime No Commercials.
Stream on your favorite devices Unlimited access to streaming content Switch plans or cancel anytime.
For personal and non-commercial use only. Compatible device and high-speed, broadband Internet connection required. Multiple concurrent streams and HD content may require higher bandwidth.
Streaming content may count against your data usage. Location data required to access content on mobile devices for any Live TV subscription.
Live TV may vary by subscription and location.